James Ratsasane

On Practice

Abstract

systemic and institutional constraints. Along this journey, this project also explores the sub questions of: How might reflection facilitate a better understanding of practice? How might engagement with community inform practice? Finally, how might a platform for critical practice work? In essence, this project is about defining a preferred future practice.

Having engaged with art, design and music for the past 10 years, for me the notion of what consti-tutes practice has been hard to define. As Blauvelt (2008) notes, even within the design discipline, ‘it is extremely difficult to pinpoint coherent sets of ideas or beliefs guiding recent work’ (para 2). This perhaps has been largely to do with design’s con-tinual paradigm shifts and sense of becoming. As Van der Velden (2006) notes, ‘designers today are forming models and speculative scenarios. They bring design thinking into a more strategic under-standing of what design might become’. It is along these lines that I became curious about how research could facilitate an understanding of what my future practice could be. Thus, the question of ‘what constitutes practice for me?’ has been a provocation—a challenge to reflect, define, and clarify values, goals and new parameters. The methodology adopted was a reflection-based approach through practice-led, studio sprint phases. The research was also supplemented with qualitative interviews with experts in the field. As a consequence, the format of this exegesis echoes this approach, which has been nonlinear and iterative. The goal of this discussion is to show how knowledge about practice can emerge from within practice. Each chapter discusses interwoven reflections and insights garnered from the interviews, literature, studio artefacts and critical events.

The research outcomes culminated in three studio artefacts: the publications, ‘In Search of A Manifesto: Reflections of Practice 2014–2018’, ‘Practice As’; and lastly, an online platform archive, ‘1-L-P’. Spurred by these artefacts, reflexive writing, maintaining open conditions, engaging with a community of practice, and building agency have emerged as new ways to approach design with a conceptual and holistic understanding. In what follows is the story of my research project.

  • Phase one of the project involved a critical review of my practice over the past four years. The reflection included an analysis of central themes and tactics in my work, as well as inspirations and influential texts. Taking the form of a compendium, the publication was used as a tool for evaluation, critical thinking, and provocation, eliciting motivations and feelings about my progression as a designer and critical thinker. The goal of this phase was to uncover values, motivations, and parameters of my practice thus far.
  • Phase one of the project involved a critical review of my practice over the past four years. The reflection included an analysis of central themes and tactics in my work, as well as inspirations and influential texts. Taking the form of a compendium, the publication was used as a tool for evaluation, critical thinking, and provocation, eliciting motivations and feelings about my progression as a designer and critical thinker. The goal of this phase was to uncover values, motivations, and parameters of my practice thus far.

  • After engaging in reflection and collecting feedback from peers, I mapped the insights from phase one into preliminary values and positions. I compared the insights with qualitative research in the form of interviews with experts in the field. This activity culminated in a second publication, ‘Practice As’. Listening to other designer’s perspectives provided a firewall against personal assumptions and also opened up unexpected possibilities for future directions.
  • After engaging in reflection and collecting feedback from peers, I mapped the insights from phase one into preliminary values and positions. I compared the insights with qualitative research in the form of interviews with experts in the field. This activity culminated in a second publication, ‘Practice As’. Listening to other designer’s perspectives provided a firewall against personal assumptions and also opened up unexpected possibilities for future directions.

  • Post reflection and feedback from peers, phase three involved the synthesis of insights from phase one and two, followed by the ideation and design of an online platform that acted as an archive of this research project, a mode of presentation, as well as a platform for disseminating reflective practice. This capstone phase catalysed the research findings and communicated to other practitioners and researchers insights into what constitutes my practice, while also serving as a generative tool for discourse and engagement. The platform formed the basis of a continuing dialogue between my practice and community, and acts as a reflective tool while contributing to communication design knowledge.
  • Post reflection and feedback from peers, phase three involved the synthesis of insights from phase one and two, followed by the ideation and design of an online platform that acted as an archive of this research project, a mode of presentation, as well as a platform for disseminating reflective practice. This capstone phase catalysed the research findings and communicated to other practitioners and researchers insights into what constitutes my practice, while also serving as a generative tool for discourse and engagement. The platform formed the basis of a continuing dialogue between my practice and community, and acts as a reflective tool while contributing to communication design knowledge.

  • Artefacts

  • Select Bibliography

    1. Brinkers, Erwin, Dungen, Danny Van Den, and Stolk, Marieke (2008). Experimental Jetset - Design and Ideology. Retrieved from https://www.experimentaljetset.nl/archive/design-ideology.

    2. Owens, Mark. (2006). ‘Graphics Incognito’ in Dot Dot Dot 12, New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

    3. Van der Velden, Daniel, ‘Research & Destroy: Graphic Design as Investigation’, Metropolis M, April/May 2006. Reprinted in Blauvelt, Andrew, Ellen Lupton, and Rob Giampietro. Graphic Design: Now in Production. Minneapo-lis, MN: Walker Art Center, 2011, pp. 16–18.